Prepared for NCT07031219

Unlock the power to be your own CRO.

Go beyond your protocol and create an operations plan with Polytrial, the AI-powered platform for research professionals. Leverage insights from thousands of reference trials and fix operations issues before they derail your study. Polytrial saves you time and money, without an army of consultants.

Operations analysis report

Study title

Impact of Challenging Engagement on Cognition in Older Adults

NCT#

NCT03962439

Last updated

Jun 19, 2025

10 recommendations found

Clinical Research Coordinator Analysis

Investigational Product Administration Training

Finding: The protocol (Section 6.2.1, page 32) mandates subject training for at-home subcutaneous self-administration of the Investigational Product (IP), including demonstration of satisfactory technique by the subject prior to self-administering at home. However, the protocol lacks specific details on the minimum content of this training, standardized objective criteria for assessing "satisfactory technique," and the precise documentation required to confirm training completion and competency. This ambiguity presents a risk of inconsistent training quality across different site staff or between sites, potentially leading to subject errors in IP administration at home (impacting safety and data integrity) and insufficient or non-standardized documentation of this critical procedure. Recommendation: To ensure uniformity and thoroughness, it is recommended that the Sponsor develop and provide all sites with a standardized "IP Self-Administration Training Checklist and Competency Assessment Form." This form should outline key training topics (e.g., IP storage at home, syringe preparation, aseptic technique, rotation of injection sites, correct subcutaneous injection technique, observation for and management of common injection site reactions, procedure for missed doses, and proper disposal of used pre-filled syringes). It should also include clear, observable criteria for assessing "satisfactory technique" (e.g., subject correctly verbalizes steps, subject performs a return demonstration on a model or self with saline placebo under supervision). The completed and signed form, attesting to the subject's competency, should be specified as a required source document to be filed in the subject's records and/or Investigator Site File (ISF). Rationale: Implementing a standardized training checklist and competency assessment will ensure all participants receive consistent and comprehensive instruction, enhancing patient safety by minimizing the risk of IP administration errors at home. It will also improve compliance with the prescribed dosing regimen, strengthen data reliability, and provide robust, uniform documentation for monitoring and audit purposes, thereby reducing the risk of protocol deviations related to IP administration.

Operations analysis report

Clinical Research Coordinator Analysis

Investigational Product Administration Training

Finding: The protocol (Section 6.2.1, page 32) mandates subject training for at-home subcutaneous self-administration of the Investigational Product (IP), including demonstration of satisfactory technique by the subject prior to self-administering at home. However, the protocol lacks specific details on the minimum content of this training, standardized objective criteria for assessing "satisfactory technique," and the precise documentation required to confirm training completion and competency. This ambiguity presents a risk of inconsistent training quality across different site staff or between sites, potentially leading to subject errors in IP administration at home (impacting safety and data integrity) and insufficient or non-standardized documentation of this critical procedure. Recommendation: To ensure uniformity and thoroughness, it is recommended that the Sponsor develop and provide all sites with a standardized "IP Self-Administration Training Checklist and Competency Assessment Form." This form should outline key training topics (e.g., IP storage at home, syringe preparation, aseptic technique, rotation of injection sites, correct subcutaneous injection technique, observation for and management of common injection site reactions, procedure for missed doses, and proper disposal of used pre-filled syringes). It should also include clear, observable criteria for assessing "satisfactory technique" (e.g., subject correctly verbalizes steps, subject performs a return demonstration on a model or self with saline placebo under supervision). The completed and signed form, attesting to the subject's competency, should be specified as a required source document to be filed in the subject's records and/or Investigator Site File (ISF). Rationale: Implementing a standardized training checklist and competency assessment will ensure all participants receive consistent and comprehensive instruction, enhancing patient safety by minimizing the risk of IP administration errors at home. It will also improve compliance with the prescribed dosing regimen, strengthen data reliability, and provide robust, uniform documentation for monitoring and audit purposes, thereby reducing the risk of protocol deviations related to IP administration.

We know University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is already a research leader. Explore how Polytrial could have helped with past studies.

Overwhelmed by the operations side of research? Polytrial can help.

Congrats on posting NCT07031219! We understand the hard work behind every clinical trial and the obstacles that stand in your way. From innovative treatments blocked by operations breakdowns, to spiraling budgets and software that makes things worse, to the endless back-and-forth to get your team on the same page. Even the best researchers can use help breaking through.

Real-time operational insights

Real-time operational insights

Visual workflow modeling

Visual workflow modeling

GxP tracking

GxP tracking

Improve your operations in three simple steps

Today

Today

Today

Schedule an operations consultation

Take the first step towards a successful trial by discussing your protocol and any existing operating procedures and policies. We'll lay the foundation to translate your scientific design into an actionable, real-world study plan. We value your confidentiality and frequently enter NDAs to protect potential partners. You can request an NDA [here](Common Paper link).

2 weeks

2 weeks

2 weeks

Start your operations plan buildout

Once we aligned on your needs, Polytrial gets to work. We use a mix of expert operations professionals and an AI-powered study team to find and fix potential bottlenecks. We'll visualize all workflows, generate critical operational insights, and simulate stakeholder feedback to design a robust and efficient trial.

1 month

1 month

1 month

Launch confidently & optimize continuously

With Polytrial as your guide, easily manage study updates and protocol amendments, ensuring continuous alignment across your team. Quickly activate and train new sites with intuitive, version-controlled workflows, proactively identifying and resolving issues to keep your study on track and save time and money.

FAQ

What is Polytrial?

Who should use Polytrial?

How does Polytrial work?

What are the platform’s key features?

How do you use artificial intelligence?

How is Polytrial different?

Is Polytrial self-serve?

Can Polytrial integrate with existing systems?

Want to learn more?
Schedule an operations consultation

Find & fix bottlenecks in minutes

© 2024 Polytrial Corp.

Find & fix bottlenecks in minutes

© 2024 Polytrial Corp.

Find & fix bottlenecks in minutes

© 2024 Polytrial Corp.